Summary
- GPUs are the core resource for AI workloads: average GPU utilization in K8s clusters is only 30-40%; scheduling optimization can increase it to 80%+
- NVIDIA MIG partitioning: a single A100 can be split into 7 instances, supporting parallel execution of different AI tasks, boosting resource utilization by 3x
- Three GPU sharing modes: Time Slicing (TS), MPS, and MIG, suited for inference, training, and mixed scenarios respectively
- Multi-tenant scheduling strategies: GPU quota management, priority-based preemption, and elastic scaling to ensure SLA compliance
- This article provides a full-stack K8s GPU scheduling solution, including Device Plugin configuration and scheduler extension practices
Table of Contents
GPU Scheduling: The Core Challenge of AI Clusters
Current State of GPU Resource Waste
| Issue |
Cause |
Waste Percentage |
| Low inference utilization |
Single inference request uses only 10-20% GPU |
40-60% |
| Training fragmentation |
Small model training occupies an entire card |
20-30% |
| Idle waiting |
Tasks queuing for GPU release |
15-25% |
| Misconfiguration |
Resource requests do not match actual usage |
10-15% |
GPU Scheduling Evolution
| Phase |
Period |
Approach |
Characteristics |
| Exclusive mode |
Before 2020 |
1Pod=1GPU |
Simple but wasteful |
| Time slicing |
2021 |
GPU time-slice sharing |
Suited for inference |
| MIG partitioning |
2022 |
A100 hardware-level partitioning |
Strong isolation |
| MPS sharing |
2023 |
Multi-process GPU sharing |
Suited for training |
| Elastic scheduling |
2024-2026 |
Dynamic MIG + priority |
Intelligent |
Mainstream GPU Specifications in 2026
| GPU |
Memory |
MIG Instances |
Suited Scenarios |
Price ($/h) |
| A100 80GB |
80GB |
7x10GB or 2x40GB |
General training & inference |
3.5 |
| H100 80GB |
80GB |
7x10GB or 2x40GB |
Large model training |
4.5 |
| H200 141GB |
141GB |
7x20GB or 2x70GB |
Ultra-large models |
6.0 |
| L40S 48GB |
48GB |
MIG not supported |
Inference/fine-tuning |
1.5 |
| RTX 4090 |
24GB |
MIG not supported |
Development & testing |
0.8 |
NVIDIA MIG Partitioning in Practice
MIG Architecture Overview
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ A100 80GB MIG Partitioning Schemes │
│ │
│ Scheme 1: 7x MIG 1g.10gb (maximum parallelism) │
│ ┌──────┐┌──────┐┌──────┐┌──────┐┌──────┐┌──────┐┌──────┐ │
│ │ GI 0 ││ GI 1 ││ GI 2 ││ GI 3 ││ GI 4 ││ GI 5 ││ GI 6 │ │
│ │10GB ││10GB ││10GB ││10GB ││10GB ││10GB ││10GB │ │
│ │14SM ││14SM ││14SM ││14SM ││14SM ││14SM ││14SM │ │
│ └──────┘└──────┘└──────┘└──────┘└──────┘└──────┘└──────┘ │
│ Suited for: 7 lightweight inference services in parallel │
│ │
│ Scheme 2: 2x MIG 3g.40gb (large model inference) │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────┐┌─────────────────────────────┐│
│ │ GI 0 ││ GI 1 ││
│ │ 40GB ││ 40GB ││
│ │ 42SM ││ 42SM ││
│ └─────────────────────────────┘└─────────────────────────────┘│
│ Suited for: 2x 70B model inference (quantized) │
│ │
│ Scheme 3: 1x MIG 4g.40gb + 2x MIG 1g.10gb (mixed) │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────┐┌──────┐┌──────┐ │
│ │ GI 0 ││ GI 1 ││ GI 2 │ │
│ │ 40GB ││10GB ││10GB │ │
│ │ 56SM ││14SM ││14SM │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────┘└──────┘└──────┘ │
│ Suited for: 1 large model inference + 2 lightweight inference │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
MIG Configuration in Practice
# nvidia-mig-config.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: nvidia-mig-config
namespace: gpu-operator
data:
config.yaml: |
version: v1
mig-configs:
all-1g.10gb:
- devices: all
mig-enabled: true
mig-devices:
"1g.10gb": 7
all-2g.20gb:
- devices: all
mig-enabled: true
mig-devices:
"2g.20gb": 3
all-3g.40gb:
- devices: all
mig-enabled: true
mig-devices:
"3g.40gb": 2
mixed:
- devices: [0]
mig-enabled: true
mig-devices:
"3g.40gb": 2
- devices: [1]
mig-enabled: true
mig-devices:
"1g.10gb": 7
- devices: [2, 3]
mig-enabled: false
---
apiVersion: nvidia.com/v1alpha1
kind: MigManager
metadata:
name: mig-manager
spec:
config: nvidia-mig-config
gpuClientsConfig:
version: v1
gpuClients:
- namespace: "ai-inference"
podSelector:
matchLabels:
workload: "llm-inference"
migDevice: "3g.40gb"
- namespace: "ai-inference"
podSelector:
matchLabels:
workload: "light-inference"
migDevice: "1g.10gb"
MIG Pod Scheduling
# Large model inference - using MIG 3g.40gb
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: llm-inference-70b
namespace: ai-inference
labels:
workload: llm-inference
spec:
containers:
- name: inference
image: vllm/vllm-openai:latest
resources:
limits:
nvidia.com/mig-3g.40gb: 1
env:
- name: MODEL_NAME
value: "Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-AWQ"
- name: GPU_MEMORY_UTILIZATION
value: "0.95"
- name: MAX_MODEL_LEN
value: "8192"
---
# Lightweight inference - using MIG 1g.10gb
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: embedding-service
namespace: ai-inference
labels:
workload: light-inference
spec:
containers:
- name: embedding
image: huggingface/tei:latest
resources:
limits:
nvidia.com/mig-1g.10gb: 1
env:
- name: MODEL_NAME
value: "BAAI/bge-large-zh-v1.5"
- name: MAX_BATCH_SIZE
value: "256"
Three GPU Sharing Modes
Mode Comparison
| Dimension |
Time Slicing (TS) |
MPS |
MIG |
| Isolation level |
Software |
Hardware (partial) |
Hardware (complete) |
| Memory isolation |
No (shared) |
No (shared) |
Yes (independent) |
| Performance isolation |
Poor |
Medium |
Good |
| Parallelism |
High |
Medium |
Medium |
| Fault isolation |
Poor |
Poor |
Good |
| Suited scenarios |
Inference |
Training |
Mixed |
| GPU requirement |
General |
Volta+ |
A100+ |
Time Slicing Configuration
# gpu-time-slicing.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: gpu-time-slicing-config
namespace: gpu-operator
data:
config.yaml: |
version: v1
flags:
migStrategy: none
sharing:
timeSlicing:
renameByDefault: false
resources:
- name: nvidia.com/gpu
replicas: 4
devices: all
---
# Pod using time slicing
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: inference-pool
namespace: ai-inference
spec:
replicas: 8
selector:
matchLabels:
app: inference
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: inference
spec:
containers:
- name: inference
image: vllm/vllm-openai:latest
resources:
limits:
nvidia.com/gpu: 1
env:
- name: MODEL_NAME
value: "Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct"
MPS Configuration
# gpu-mps-config.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: gpu-mps-config
namespace: gpu-operator
data:
config.yaml: |
version: v1
sharing:
mps:
resources:
- name: nvidia.com/gpu
replicas: 2
devices: all
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: training-job-mps
namespace: ai-training
spec:
containers:
- name: training
image: pytorch/pytorch:2.4-cuda12.4
resources:
limits:
nvidia.com/gpu: 1
command:
- python
- -m
- torch.distributed.launch
- --nproc_per_node=2
- train.py
Sharing Mode Selection Decision Tree
Do you have A100/H100?
├── No → Time Slicing (inference) / MPS (training)
└── Yes → Need full isolation?
├── Yes → MIG partitioning
└── No → Need training?
├── Yes → MPS
└── No → Time Slicing
K8s GPU Device Plugin Configuration
NVIDIA Device Plugin Deployment
# nvidia-device-plugin.yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: DaemonSet
metadata:
name: nvidia-device-plugin-daemonset
namespace: kube-system
spec:
selector:
matchLabels:
name: nvidia-device-plugin-ds
template:
metadata:
labels:
name: nvidia-device-plugin-ds
spec:
tolerations:
- key: nvidia.com/gpu
operator: Exists
effect: NoSchedule
priorityClassName: system-node-critical
containers:
- name: nvidia-device-plugin
image: nvcr.io/nvidia/k8s-device-plugin:v0.16.0
args:
- --config=default
- --mig-strategy=mixed
- --pass-device-specs=true
- --device-list-strategy=configmap
securityContext:
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
capabilities:
drop: ["ALL"]
volumeMounts:
- name: device-plugin
mountPath: /var/lib/kubelet/device-plugins
volumes:
- name: device-plugin
hostPath:
path: /var/lib/kubelet/device-plugins
GPU Resource Monitoring
# gpu-monitor.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: gpu-monitor-config
namespace: monitoring
data:
gpu-metrics.json: |
{
"metrics": [
"gpu_utilization",
"gpu_memory_utilization",
"gpu_memory_used_bytes",
"gpu_memory_total_bytes",
"gpu_power_usage_watts",
"gpu_temperature_celsius",
"gpu_sm_clock_mhz",
"gpu_mem_clock_mhz"
],
"scrape_interval": "15s",
"labels": {
"cluster": "production",
"region": "cn-east"
}
}
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: DaemonSet
metadata:
name: dcgm-exporter
namespace: monitoring
spec:
selector:
matchLabels:
app: dcgm-exporter
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: dcgm-exporter
spec:
containers:
- name: dcgm-exporter
image: nvcr.io/nvidia/k8s/dcgm-exporter:3.3.7
ports:
- containerPort: 9400
name: metrics
env:
- name: DCGM_EXPORTER_COLLECTORS
value: "/etc/dcgm-exporter/dcp-metrics-inventory.csv"
resources:
limits:
nvidia.com/gpu: 1
Multi-Tenant GPU Scheduling Strategies
GPU Quota Management
# gpu-resource-quota.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: ResourceQuota
metadata:
name: gpu-quota-team-a
namespace: team-a
spec:
hard:
requests.nvidia.com/gpu: "8"
limits.nvidia.com/gpu: "8"
requests.nvidia.com/mig-3g.40gb: "4"
limits.nvidia.com/mig-3g.40gb: "4"
requests.nvidia.com/mig-1g.10gb: "14"
limits.nvidia.com/mig-1g.10gb: "14"
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: ResourceQuota
metadata:
name: gpu-quota-team-b
namespace: team-b
spec:
hard:
requests.nvidia.com/gpu: "4"
limits.nvidia.com/gpu: "4"
requests.nvidia.com/mig-3g.40gb: "2"
limits.nvidia.com/mig-3g.40gb: "2"
Priority-Based Preemption Scheduling
# gpu-priority-class.yaml
apiVersion: scheduling.k8s.io/v1
kind: PriorityClass
metadata:
name: gpu-critical
value: 1000000
globalDefault: false
description: "Critical GPU workloads - can preempt others"
---
apiVersion: scheduling.k8s.io/v1
kind: PriorityClass
metadata:
name: gpu-high
value: 900000
globalDefault: false
description: "High priority GPU workloads"
---
apiVersion: scheduling.k8s.io/v1
kind: PriorityClass
metadata:
name: gpu-low
value: 100000
globalDefault: false
description: "Low priority GPU workloads - preemptible"
---
# Online inference - high priority
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: online-inference
spec:
template:
spec:
priorityClassName: gpu-critical
containers:
- name: inference
resources:
limits:
nvidia.com/mig-3g.40gb: 1
---
# Offline training - low priority
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: Job
metadata:
name: offline-training
spec:
template:
spec:
priorityClassName: gpu-low
containers:
- name: training
resources:
limits:
nvidia.com/gpu: 4
GPU Elastic Scaling
# gpu-hpa.yaml
apiVersion: autoscaling/v2
kind: HorizontalPodAutoscaler
metadata:
name: inference-hpa
namespace: ai-inference
spec:
scaleTargetRef:
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
name: inference-pool
minReplicas: 2
maxReplicas: 20
metrics:
- type: Pods
pods:
metric:
name: gpu_utilization
target:
type: AverageValue
averageValue: "70"
- type: Pods
pods:
metric:
name: request_latency_ms
target:
type: AverageValue
averageValue: "200"
behavior:
scaleUp:
stabilizationWindowSeconds: 60
policies:
- type: Percent
value: 50
periodSeconds: 120
scaleDown:
stabilizationWindowSeconds: 300
policies:
- type: Percent
value: 25
periodSeconds: 300
Production GPU Cluster Management
GPU Node Labeling and Scheduling
# gpu-node-labels.yaml
# Label GPU types
kubectl label nodes gpu-node-1 nvidia.com/gpu.product=A100-SXM4-80GB
kubectl label nodes gpu-node-2 nvidia.com/gpu.product=H100-SXM5-80GB
kubectl label nodes gpu-node-3 nvidia.com/gpu.product=L40S-48GB
# Label MIG configurations
kubectl label nodes gpu-node-1 nvidia.com/mig.config=mixed
kubectl label nodes gpu-node-2 nvidia.com/mig.config=all-3g.40gb
# Schedule to specific GPU
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: h100-training
spec:
nodeSelector:
nvidia.com/gpu.product: H100-SXM5-80GB
containers:
- name: training
resources:
limits:
nvidia.com/gpu: 8
GPU Fault Self-Healing
# gpu-health-check.yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: DaemonSet
metadata:
name: gpu-health-monitor
namespace: kube-system
spec:
selector:
matchLabels:
app: gpu-health-monitor
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: gpu-health-monitor
spec:
serviceAccountName: gpu-health-sa
containers:
- name: monitor
image: custom/gpu-health-monitor:latest
env:
- name: CHECK_INTERVAL
value: "60"
- name: MEMORY_ERROR_THRESHOLD
value: "10"
- name: TEMPERATURE_THRESHOLD
value: "90"
- name: AUTO_CORDON
value: "true"
volumeMounts:
- name: nvidia
mountPath: /usr/local/nvidia
volumes:
- name: nvidia
hostPath:
path: /usr/local/nvidia
GPU Utilization Optimization Results
| Optimization Measure |
Utilization Increase |
Cost Savings |
| MIG partitioning |
+35% |
30% |
| Time slicing |
+25% |
20% |
| Priority scheduling |
+15% |
15% |
| Elastic scaling |
+10% |
10% |
| Combined optimization |
+50% |
50% |
Summary and Resources
Key Takeaways
- MIG Partitioning: The killer feature of A100/H100 — turn 1 card into 7, the first choice for inference scenarios
- GPU Sharing: Time Slicing for inference, MPS for training, MIG for mixed workloads
- Multi-Tenant Scheduling: The trio of quotas + priorities + elastic scaling ensures SLA compliance
- Combined Optimization: MIG + scheduling + scaling together can achieve 50% cost savings
GPU Scheduling Solution Recommendations
| Cluster Size |
Recommended Solution |
Expected Utilization |
| <8 cards |
Time Slicing |
60% |
| 8-32 cards |
MIG + Time Slicing |
75% |
| 32-128 cards |
MIG + Priority Scheduling |
80% |
| >128 cards |
Full solution suite |
85%+ |
Need to quickly generate cURL commands to test GPU inference APIs? Try our cURL to Code tool and JSON Formatter.
Further Reading